Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Jugendra vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33247 of 2018
Applicant :- Jugendra
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Sharma,Prashant Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
I do not find any merit in this application warranting interference in inherent jurisdiction.
At this stage the learned counsel for the applicant made a prayer that the bail application of the applicant in S.T. No.96 of 2015 (State Vs. Amit and others) in Case Crime No.421/64 of 2014, under Section 302 I.P.C, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Bulandshahar be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Court below.
After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. this application is finally disposed of with a direction that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the Courts below within 45 days from today and applies for bail, then his bail application shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57) ALR-290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number for the aforesaid offences.
Order Date :- 31.10.2018 SS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jugendra vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 October, 2018
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Pankaj Sharma Prashant Sharma