Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Juganu Chaudhary vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36031 of 2018 Petitioner :- Juganu Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudha Pandey
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Smt. Sudha Pandey, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
The petitioner in the writ petition states that he is willing to deposit the entire loan amount of Rs.8,20,972.75/- in easy instalments.
In our view, it is not the business of the High Court to fix instalments as it is a contractual matter between the petitioner and the bank concerned. The petitioner should approach the bank itself and get the instalments fixed to the satisfaction of the parties.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to apply before the respondent No.3- Punjab National Bank within one week from today in respect of the relief as claimed in the writ petition. In the event such application is made by the petitioner, the respondent No.3- Punjab National Bank shall pass appropriate order thereon within a period of one month thereafter.
It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merit.
Order Date :- 30.10.2018 Sweety
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Juganu Chaudhary vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 October, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh