Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Jubair Ali @ Sonu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26082 of 2021 Applicant :- Jubair Ali @ Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Saroj Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A and gone through the record.
This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant- Jubair Ali @ Sonu, who is involved in Case Crime No. 23 of 2021, under Sections 399, 402 IPC, P.S. Utraon, District Prayaraj.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case; that there is no evidence against the applicant in regard to preparing loot of the vehicle, neither any person of locality or public person were supported the version of the prosecution; It is further submitted that co-accused Abdul Saleem has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 15203 of 2021 by order dated 18.5.2021. Claiming parity, pleading false implication it is lastly contended that the accused applicant is languishing in jail since 29.01.2021 and in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail.However, granting bail to co-accused and parity has not been disputed.
Keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without touching the merits of the case, the accused applicant is entitled for bail.
Let the above mentioned applicant involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, shall cooperate in the investigation or trial and will not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
2. In case of breach of any of the conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
3. However, if due to Covind-19 pandemic, the Sub-ordinate Court is under lockdown, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.
4. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
5. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
It is made clear that in the event the Sub-ordinate Court is functional as usual then the normal procedure/ mode of filing bail bonds and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned will be adopted.
Order Date :- 27.7.2021 Fhd.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jubair Ali @ Sonu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2021
Judges
  • Umesh Kumar
Advocates
  • Saroj Kumar Dubey