Ashok Bhushan, Ag.C.J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to the 10th respondent in view of the order which is being passed.
2. By this writ petition the petitioner has come up with a prayer to quash Ext.P2 order granting FL-3 license to 10th respondent. Petitioner's grievance is that after obtaining the license the 10th respondent Hotel is running without complying with all necessary conditions including running of restaurant. He submits that several complaints were filed before the authorities concerned which have not been looked into by them. He also refers to the Advocate Commissioner's report in O.S. No.685 of 2014 filed by one Sajeevan in the Munsiff's Court. By the order of learned Single Judge dated 18.11.2014, this writ petition has been placed before this Bench treating it as a Public Interest Litigation.
WP(C) No. 21331 of 2014 -:2:-
3. The issues which have been raised by the petitioner are issues of facts which are required to be considered by authorities concerned. In the facts of the present case we are of the view that this Writ Petition need not be entertained as a Public Interest Litigation. However, petitioner is at liberty to submit appropriate representation before the 3rd respondent who may look into the grievance and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
With the above observation, the Writ Petition is closed.
Ashok Bhushan, Acting Chief Justice.
A.M. Shaffique, Judge.
ttb/01/12 WP(C) No. 21331 of 2014 -:3:-