IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.01.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN H.C.P.No.1528 of 2016 Jothilakshmi .. Petitioner Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Villupuram District, Villupuram. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order of detention passed by the second respondent, in C2/11568/2016, dated 5.7.2016 and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the respondents to produce the detenu Rambo @ Manikandan, son of Kumar, aged about 26 years, now detained in the Central Prison, Cuddalore, before this Court and to set him at liberty, forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor - - - - ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed, by the mother of the detenu, namely, Rambo @ Manikandan, aged about 26 years, son of Kumar, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records, in No.C2/11568/2016, dated 5.7.2016, passed by the second Respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982), branding him as a “Bootlegger”, in the Central Prison, Cuddalore, and to quash the same and to direct the Respondents to produce the body of the detenu and to set him at liberty.
2 At this stage of the hearing of the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the order of detention passed by the second respondent, against the son of the petitioner, dated 5.7.2016, has been revoked by the Government, in G.O. Rt. No.3719, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XIV) Department, dated 11.8.2016 and he has also produced a copy of the said order.
3 Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
(M.J.,J.) (T.M.,J.) 10.01.2017 vvk To
1. The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
M.JAICHANDREN,J.
and T.MATHIVANAN, J.
vvk H.C.P.No.1528 of 2016 10.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in