Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jitu @ Jitendra vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29788 of 2019 Applicant :- Jitu @ Jitendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Jitu @ Jitendra with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 15 of 2019, under Sections 307, 504 I.P.C., Police Station- Vrindavan, District- Mathura, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that for the incident dated 02.01.2019, the informant has lodged the F.I.R. on 03.01.2019 whereas the F.I.R. from the applicant's side has been lodged on 04.01.2019. From both the sides, two persons have sustained injuries. Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that it is a cross case in which both sides have received injuries and who, out of the two rival groups, is the aggressor, cannot be determined at this stage. The applicant is languishing in jail since 03.04.2019. The applicant does not have any previous criminal history. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 25.7.2019 JK Yadav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jitu @ Jitendra vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2019
Judges
  • S Manju Rani Chauhan
Advocates
  • Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi