Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jitendra Tanwar And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|14 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16629 of 2019 Petitioner :- Jitendra Tanwar And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Mr Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Irshad Hussain, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record.
Perusal of record would disclose that the complainant sustained serious injuries but the petitioner has not been able to show the nature of injuries sustained by the informant/complainant.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a better petition annexing therewith the medical examination report of the complainant/informant.
Certified copy of the impugned FIR be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining the photocopy of the same.
(Vivek Varma, J.) (Ramesh Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 14.6.2019 RavindraKSingh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jitendra Tanwar And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
14 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Uma Nath Pandey