Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Jitendra Nath Shukla vs State Of U P & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52040 of 2002 Petitioner :- Jitendra Nath Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.P. Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.S.C./2673/2002
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the functioning of the petitioner as Guest Subject Specialist in his trade in the aforesaid institution, so long the scheme subsists.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 to make payment of salary to the petitioner in pay scale and grade of lecturers appointed on regular basis in a recognized institution under U.P. Intermediate Education, Act.
(iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to treat the petitioner having been appointed on regular basis and given him all privileges, increments and allowances etc. which may become due from time as are applicable in the case of regularly appointed teachers of a recognized Intermediate College."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jitendra Nath Shukla vs State Of U P & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • B P Yadav