Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Jitendra @ Jeetu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49776 of 2021 Applicant :- Jitendra @ Jeetu Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilendra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is urged by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant came to be apprehended on the information furnished by the informant to the police in an encounter; Rs.1050/- and four mobile phones is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant; it is urged that co-accused Rajat has already been enlarged on bail by this co-ordinate Bench of this Court; that the applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent and he is languishing in jail since 03.09.2021; there is no likelihood of early disposal of trial and the applicant undertakes that if enlarged on bail, he will never misuse his liberty and will co-operate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Let the applicant-Jitendra @ Jeetu involved in Case Crime No.487 of 2021, under sections 414 and 411 I.P.C., Police Station-South, District- Firozabad, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 SK Goswami (Suneet Kumar,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jitendra @ Jeetu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 December, 2021
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • Akhilendra Yadav