Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Jifly Krishnan vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala|10 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.717/2014 of Kalpakanchery Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 IPC and Sections 20 and 21 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 28.10.2014 at 4 a.m., he was found transporting sand, which is the subject matter of theft from the river by lorry bearing registration No.KL-10Q-1620. On seeing the police party, he stopped the vehicle and ran away.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.
5. No criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner. The sand as well as the vehicle involved have been seized and, therefore, there is no question of any recovery in this case. The contents of the CD reveal that the investigation of this case is practically over. I do not think that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required for the continued investigation of this case. Matters being so, I am of the view that this is a fit case wherein anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.
6. In the result, this bail application is allowed and the investigating officer or such other police officer, who is conducting the arrest of the petitioner, is directed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest on his executing a bond for `25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the officer conducting arrest, and subject to the following terms and conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer in between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Thursdays and Mondays, commencing from 13.11.2014 for a period of three months or till the filing of the final report in this case, whichever is earlier.
(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses.
(iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating officer.
(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any offence while on bail.
It is made clear that the violation of any of the conditions stipulated above will result in the cancellation of bail.
Sd/-
(B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/10/11 // True Copy // PA to Judge
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jifly Krishnan vs State Of Kerala

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
10 November, 2014
Judges
  • B Kemal Pasha
Advocates
  • Sri Babu S
  • Nair