Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Jep Chand vs S.Prabhu

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/claimant against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.107 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Nagercoil, dated 07.04.2014.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: It is a case of injury in which the accident took place on 21.04.2009 at 12.15 noon. When the petitioner was riding his two wheeler bearing Regstration No.TN-74D-7876 along with a pillion rider from Nagercoil to Kanyakumari main road, near Pothaiayadi Junction, a lorry bearing Registration No.TN-57K-5775, owned by the second respondent, which was insured with the third respondent Insurance Company, came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the two wheeler. Due to the said impact, the petitioner and the pillion rider sustained grievous injuries and immediately after the accident, they were taken to Thiraviam Orthopedic Hospital, Nagercoil and surgeries were done to grievous injuries. The petitioner was aged about 44 years at the time of accident and was earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- p.m., by doing business. Hence, he filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.107 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagercoil, claiming a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation.
3. Before the Tribunal, on the side of the claimant, two witnesses viz., P.W.1 and P.W.2 were examined and fifteen documents viz., Exs.P.1 to P.15 were marked and on the side of the respondents, one witness viz., R.W.1 was examined and three documents viz., Exs.R.1 to R.3 were marked.
4.The Tribunal, after considering the pleadings, oral and documentary evidence and arguments of the counsel for the appellant and respondents and also appreciating the evidence on record, held that the accident occurred only, due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending vehicle and directed the third respondent Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.1,08,900/- to the claimant.
5. Against which, the appellant/claimant filed the present appeal for enhancement of compensation.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant/ claimant would submit that the Tribunal awarded very meagre amount for 15% disability. He further submitted that the amounts awarded under others heads are also very meagre. Hence, he prays for enhancement of compensation.
7. The learned Counsel for the third respondent Insurance Company would submit that based on the oral and documentary evidences, the Tribunal has correctly come to the conclusion and awarded just and reasonable compensation and hence, the award passed by the Tribunal deserves no interference and hence, this appeal has to be dismissed.
8. Heard the learned counsel appearing on both sides and perused the materials available on record.
9. A perusal of the award passed by the Tribunal, it is seen that for 15% disability, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.2,000/- for each percentage of disability, which is in the considered opinion of this Court, very meagre. Relying upon the judgment of this Court in National Insurance Company Limited v. G.Ramesh and another reported in 2013 (2) TN MAC 583, this Court is inclined to grant a sum of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) for 1% disability. Hence, a sum of Rs.45,000/- ( Rs.3000/- x15%) is awarded for 15% disability sustained by the injured claimant. Since the Tribunal has not granted any amount towards pain and sufferings, considering the pain and sufferings undergone by the injured claimant due to the accident, this Court is inclined to grant a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards this head. Further the Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards loss of amenities, hence, this Court is incline to grant a sum of Rs.25,000/- towards the same. The Tribunal has awarded only meagre amount towards extra nourishment and for transport expenses. Considering the period of treatment taken by the injured claimant, this Court is inclined to enhance the same to Rs.10,000/- and Rs.10,000/- respectively. The amounts awarded under other heads stand unaltered.
10. In view of the above, this Court modifies the award of the Tribunal by enhancing the compensation as under: S.No Description Amount awarded by the Tribunal Rs.
Amount awarded by this Court Rs.
Award confirmed or enhanced or granted
1. For disability 30,000 45,000 enhanced 2 For attendant charges 5,000 5,000 confirmed 3 For medical expenses 47,870 47,870 confirmed 4 For medical bills 16,030 16,030 confirmed 5 For extra nourishment 5,000 10,000 enhanced 6 For transport expenses 5,000 10,000 enhanced 7 For pain and sufferings
---
1,00,000 granted 8 For loss of amenities
---
25,000 granted Total 1,08,900 2,58,900 By enhancing a sum of Rs.1,50,000
11. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed by enhancing the compensation from Rs.1,08,900/- to Rs.2,58,900/-, dated 07.04.2014, passed in M.C.O.P.No.107 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagercoil. The third respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit the entire award amount with accrued interests and costs, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already deposited and on such deposit being made, the appellant - claimant is permitted to withdraw the entire award amount, with accrued interests and costs without filing any formal petition before the Tribunal. No Costs.
To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagercoil.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jep Chand vs S.Prabhu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017