Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4574 of 2017 Appellant :- Jeet Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Aditya Vir Singh Rana
Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.
Re: Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 267747 of 2017
Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant-appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that applicant-appellant has been falsely implicated and has been wrongly convicted for the offences under Section 307/34 I.P.C.; that the applicant-appellant has been sentenced with maximum rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs.10,000/-; that as per the averments made in F.I.R. exertion by his father that the appellant fired at Nitin, the son of first informant with intention to caused his death; that injury report of the victim shows that he sustained firearm injury on his right arm and not at any vital part of body; that the injury of the victim has been opined to be grievous in nature but has not been opined to be dangerous to his life; that during trial applicant-appellant was on bail and has not misused the liberty of bail and is in custody since the date of judgement of conviction i.e. 30.06.2017; that the entire prosecution story is absolutely false and incorrect; that there are material contradictions in prosecution evidence; that the trial court has acted wrongly and illegally in convicting the accused-appellant and he has every hope of success in appeal; that there is no likelihood of appeal to be heard in near future due to huge pendency of appeals before the court; that the applicant-appellant has no criminal history; that the applicant-appellant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will remain present before the Court as and when required and he will cooperate with the hearing of appeal for which their counsel will remain present on the dates of listing.
Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of bail and contended that the applicant-appellant has been rightly convicted for the offences; that there is sufficient evidence of offences on record against the applicant-appellant.
Considering the unlikelihood of early hearing of appeal, complicity of convicts and sentence as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for grant of bail during pendency of the appeal.
Let the applicant-appellant Jeet Singh be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Judge concerned in S.T. No. 336 of 2011 (State of U.P. Vs. Jeet Singh and others) arising out of Case Crime No.674 of 2010, under Sections 307/34 I.P.C., P.S. Rajabpur, District J.P. Nagar (Amroha), and subject to deposit of 50% amount of fine imposed on them and undertaking that applicant-appellant will cooperate with the hearing of the appeal.
As soon as personal and surety bonds are furnished, photocopies of the same are directed to be transmitted to this Court forthwith by trial Judge concerned to be kept on the record of this appeal.
Order Date :- 25.7.2018 S. Thakur