Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Jeeshan vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 May, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16114 of 2021 Applicant :- Jeeshan Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
This is an application for bail on behalf of the applicant Jeeshan in Case Crime No. 530 of 2020 under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster Act and Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that he has been implicated in the present crime on account of his involvement in substantive cases being Case Crime No. 297 of 2020 under Sections 457, 458, 380, 411, 120-B IPC P.S Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur, Case Crime No.
315 of 2020 under Section 307 IPC P.S Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur, Case Crime No. 324 of 2020 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 420, 467,, 468, 471, 307 IPC P.S Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur and Case Crime No. 310 of 2020 under Sections 147, 148, 166, 307, 336, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act P.S Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur without any consideration of any evidence by the police authorities to the effect that may show that the applicant is a member of a criminal gang or its leader. It is emphatically argued that, in fact, there is no evidence to show that the applicant is a member of a criminal gang or its leader. It is asserted in paragraph no. 5 of the affidavit that the applicant has been granted bail in all the substantive offences but two bail orders alone have been annexed. It is also argued that the applicant is in jail since 05.02.2021.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the gravity of the offence, the nature of allegations, the severity of punishment, and, in particular, the fact that the applicant has been enlarged on bail in all the substantive offences, and, the fact that prima facie there is no evidence to show that the applicant is a member of a criminal gang or its leader, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
The bail application, accordingly, stands allowed.
Let the applicant Jeeshan in Case Crime No. 530 of 2020 under Section 2/3, U.P. Gangster Act and Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur be released on bail on executing his personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.
iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.
iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission.
v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(vi) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(vii) The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
(viii) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the complainant would be free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. It is further clarified that the trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
Order Date :- 12.5.2021 Deepak
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jeeshan vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 May, 2021
Judges
  • J
Advocates
  • Dhiraj Kumar Pandey