Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Jeenath vs Smt Mallik Jan

High Court Of Karnataka|13 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No.874 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) Between:
SMT JEENATH WIFE OF PYRE JAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT. HYDARALI MOHALLA, SRINIVASPUR TOWN, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 563 135.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. RASHEED KHAN., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
SMT. MALLIK JAN WIFE OF FAKRUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT. NO. HYDARALI MOHALLA SRINIVASAPUR TOWN KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 563 135.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.01.2018 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 35/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.01.2017 PASSED IN O.S. NO. 95/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINIVASAPURA.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 16.10.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Jeenath vs Smt Mallik Jan

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 December, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad