It is stated that out of wed-lock between the petitioner and the respondent, a female child was born to them. Now, the petitioner-wife is living in Chennai along with her parents. The respondent-husband filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.362 of 2014 before the Sub-Court, Dindugal for divorce. The petitioner-wife filed a petition for maintenance of herself and child, before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Poonamallee in M.C.No.2 of 2015. The petitioner finds it very difficult to travel all along from Chennai to Dindugal for every hearing at a distance of about 500 Kms, either along with the child or leaving the child with her aged parents, who could not even accompany her for the hearing in Dindugal. When the Tr.C.M.P. is taken up for hearing, though the respondent had been served with notice, there is no representation for the respondent either in person or through counsel. In the Transfer cases, the convenience of the wife should be given preference for attending her case hearings and taking into consideration the above facts and the grievances expressed by the petitioner, the Tr.C.M.P. is ordered, and H.M.O.P.No.362 of 2014 pending on the file of the Sub-Court, Dindugal, shall stand withdrawn and transferred to the Sub-Court, Poonamallee. No costs. The Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
22.02.2017 cs Copy to
1. The Sub-Judge, Dindugal.
2. The Sub-Judge, Poonamallee, Chennai.
3. The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee, Chennai.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J cs Tr.C.M.P.No.94 of 2015 22.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in