Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Jayveer vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15196 of 2018 Applicant :- Jayveer Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Kartikey Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State, and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, on 6.5.2015 some unknown persons looted the tractor trolly and assaulted Netrapal Singh who died resultantly. FIR was lodged against unknown persons. During investigation, it was found that Dharmendra and Jayveer were involved in the crime and tractor trolly was recovered at the pointing out of them.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that case of present applicant is identical to co-accused Dharmendra who has already been enlarged on bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.3.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.36738 of 2015 and the applicant is entitled to bail on the ground of parity(Bail order is annexed as annexure 9 to the bail application). He is not named in the FIR and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 26.5.2015(more than two years and ten months) having no criminal history. There is no possibility to get this case decided in short period in future. There was no independent witness. In case applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.He admitted that the applicant has no criminal history and his case is identical to co-accused Dharmendra who has been enlarged on bail.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let applicant Jayveer involved in Case Crime No.284 of 2015, under Section 302, 394, 411 IPC, Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 24.4.2018 P.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jayveer vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 April, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Kartikey Singh