Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Jayasathiya vs The Chairman

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect in the case bundle.
2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
05.09.2017 rpa To
1.The Chairman TANGEDCO No.144, Anna Salai Chennai.
2.The Chief Engineer (Personal) TANGEDCO No.144, Anna Salai Chennai.
3.The Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO Cuddalore.
W.P.No.7455 of 2016
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jayasathiya vs The Chairman

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.