Against Exts.P1 to P3 penalty orders passed by the second respondent, the petitioner has preferred Exts. P4 to P7 revisions along with Exts.P8 to P10 applications for stay, which are pending consideration before the first respondent. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any regard to the pendency of the above proceedings, Exts.P11 to P13 demand notices have been issued under Section 7 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968, which made the petitioner to approach this Court for immediate interference.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
Considering the facts and circumstances, the writ W.P.(C) No. 29488 of 2014 (I) 2 petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider Exts.P8 to P10 petitions for stay and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'one month' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Coercive proceedings pursuant to Exts.P11 to P13 demand notices shall be kept in abeyance till such time.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the first respondent for further steps.
AMV/10/11/ Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE