IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 723 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
SMT JAYAMMA WIFE OF JOHN @ NATARAJU, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT 1-167, OLD BANGALORE ROAD, BHIMANAGARA, KOLLEGALA TOWN, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT.
(BY SRI. NATARAJA M. P., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
SMT SUVARNAMMA WIFE OF LATE BASAVALINGA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT 1ST WARD, HOSAKERE, BHIMANAGARA, KOLLEGALA TOWN AND DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT ... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.12.2017 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 16/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGALA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL DNA CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.11.2015 PASSED IN O.S. NO.
244/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGAL.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 25.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
nv Ct:sr SD/- JUDGE