IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 648 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
RAJEGOWDA SON OF PATEL CHALUVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BANDABOVINAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, K.R. PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 401.
(BY SRI. KUMARA K. G., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
JAYAMMA DAUGHTER OF PATEL CHALUVEGOWDA, WIFE OF LATE. SHIVANNA AGE MAJOR, RESIDENT OF BANDABOVINAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, K.R. PET TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401.
... APPELLANT ... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC 1908, AGASINT THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.01.2017 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 32/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., K.R. PET., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.04.2010 PASSED IN OS.
NO. 140/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., K.R. PET.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 11.02.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting one week’s time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
nv Ct:sr SD/- JUDGE