IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOS.52839-52840 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. JAYAMMA D/O. T. GOVINDAIAH AGED 46 YEARS OCC: NIL NO.449, 4TH CROSS 7TH MAIN, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR BANGALORE-57. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI VENKATESH P. DALWAI, ADV.) AND:
1. THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA RAKSHA BHAVAN NEW DELHI-1 BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AIR FORCE STATION CHIMNEY HILLS CHIKKABANAVARA POST BANGALORE-90.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE CITY KANDAYA BHAVAN K.G. ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.D. HARSHA, A.G.A. FOR R3;
SRI PRADEEP SINGH, ADV. FOR R1 & R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 13.01.2010 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SR 04 VIDE ANN-C AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri Venkatesh P. Dalwai, learned counsel for petitioner. Sri Pradeep Singh, Central Government Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri Y.D. Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.3.
2. In these petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner inter alia has prayed for the following reliefs:
“a) A writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the impugned Notification dated 13- 1-2010 issued by the Respondent No.1 in S.R.O 4 produced at Annexure-C in the interest of justice and equity.
b) A writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the notification dated 20-8-2010 issued by the Respondent No.3 in No.MAG(4)MIS;CR-36/10-11 dated 28-8-2010 produced at Annexure-D, in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. When the matters were taken up for consideration today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the notifications which have been impugned in these petitions have already been quashed by a Bench of this Court by order dated 11.10.2018 passed in W.P.No.36980-36992/2014 and connected petitions. The aforesaid aspect of the matter is not disputed by Sri Y.D. Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.3.
4. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petitions are disposed of on same terms and with similar direction.
Sd/- JUDGE ST