IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.53099/2017 & WRIT PETITION NOS.55308-309/2017 (LR-WC) BETWEEN:
SMT. JAYALASKHMAMMA W/O SRI.KYATHAPPA, D/O. LATE CHIKKANNA AND LATE SMT. MUNINANJAMMA, RESIDING AT HASIGALA VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN CODE – 562 129 (BY SRI C.V. ANNAIAH, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAND REFORMS, M.S.BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL HOSKOTE TALUK, HOSKOTE – 562 114 3. SRI. H.C. NARAYANAGOWDA S/O. CHOWDAPPA @ CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HASIGALA VILLAGE, ... PETITIONER SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN CODE – 562 129 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R1 & 2; SRI. RAJANNA, ADV. FOR R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.04.2017 AS PER ANNEXURE-K PASSED BY THE R-2 AND TO REMOVE THE MUTATION ENTRY EFFECTED IN THE NAME OF THE R-3 WITH RESPECT OF THE PROPERTIES IN QUESTION.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for petitioner has filed a memo stating thereunder that matter between petitioner and third respondent has been settled. The contents of memo reads as under:
“The petitioner filed the above petition challenging the order passed by the second respondent. The above matter is settled amicable between the petitioner and the respondent No.3 as per the settlement. The respondent has given 0.32 guntas and executed settlement deed in favour of the petitioner in respect of Sy.No.43 of Hasigala village, Sulibele Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, out of 3 acres 31 guntas which is item No.2 of the schedule property. Hence, the petitioners prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above petition as not pressed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice.”
Learned counsel appearing for third respondent has also endorsed on the said memo. Placing the said memo on record, petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- JUDGE DR