IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.9597/2015 (MV) BETWEEN :
1. SMT. JAYACHITRA WIFE OF LATE K. SHIVAKUMAR @ BABU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT BESIDE SHOE PALACE B.H.ROAD, BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT 2. MASTER S. KIRTHAN KUMAR SON OF LATE K. SHIVAKUMAR @ BABU AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY NEXT FRIEND MOTHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. JAYACHITRA RESIDING AT BESIDE SHOE PALACE B.H.ROAD, BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. SMT. REKHA WIFE OF LATE UMESH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREESH BAKERY TARIKERE ROAD MADHAVACHAR CIRCLE BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT 2. SRI TEJAS SON OF LATE UMESH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREESH BAKERY TARIKERE ROAD MADHAVACHAR CIRCLE BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT 3. SRI KEERTHAN SON OF LATE UMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREESH BAKERY TARIKERE ROAD MADHAVACHAR CIRCLE BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT 4. SRI DEEPAK SON OF MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT GAJANOOR AGRAHARA VILLAGE SHIVAMOGA TALUK SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT 5. SRI A.M.RAVI SON OF MANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESIDING AT VADDARAHATTI VILLAGE ARAKALGODU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 6. SRI RAMA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 10003-E SR II CO., INDUSTRIAL AREA SITLIPURA, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN – 302 022 7. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA WIFE OF H. VENKATACHARYA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT IHLC/3AB HUTHA COLONY BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.03.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.1255/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, ADDITIONAL MACT-11, BHADRAVATHI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
On 15.09.2016, two weeks’ time was granted for compliance of office objections raised on the appeal failing which it was ordered that the appeal would stand dismissed. As the office objections were not complied within the time granted, the appeal stood dismissed on expiry of the time granted. Hence, no further order is necessary.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE KSR Sd/- JUDGE