Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48615 of 2003 Petitioner :- Jay Dyal Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bishram Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 13.6.2002 passed by the respondent no. 7 and impugned order dated 19.6.2003 passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure No. 9 and 11 respectively to this writ petition).
(b) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to make any deduction from the salary of the petitioner in pursuance to the orders dated 13.6.2002 and 19.6.2003 passed by the respondents No. 7 and 3 respectively.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 PS