IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5203 OF 2014 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5204 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5203 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
SMT JAVANAMMA W/O LATE SRI JAVARAIAH R/A DEVARAJA NILAYA FLOUR AND HULLER MILL, KOTTANAGERI STREET NEAR HASANANAMBA TEMPLE HASSAN-570201.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI: MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ARKALGUD P.S. REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001.
2. SMT N R BAGYA W/O SRI K G VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/A NERALA HALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI ARAKALAGUD TALUK HASSAN-570201 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, SPP-II FOR R1 SRI: B.M.MOHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S. 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH COMPLAINT DATED:20.11.2007 FILED BEFORE THE JMFC, ARAKALGUD, HASSAN, AT PCR NO.142/2007, WHEREIN THE PETR. IS ACCUSED NO.4, HEREIN ENCLOSED AS DOCUMENT NO.1 AND ALL PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO;
IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5204 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
SMT MALA RESIDING AT VENKATESHWARA AUTO MOBILE, SANTEPETA, B.M ROAD, HASSAN-570201.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI: MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ARKALGUD P.S. REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001.
2. SMT. N.R. BAGYA W/O SRI K.G. VISHWANATHA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NERALA HALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ARAKALA GUD TALUK, HASSAN 570201 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, SPP-II FOR R1 SRI: B.M.MOHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S. 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH COMPLAINT DATED:20.11.2007 FILED BEFORE THE JMFC, ARAKALGUD, HASSAN, AT PCR NO.142/2007, WHEREIN THE PETR. IS ACCUSED NO.8, HEREIN ENCLOSED AS DOCUMENT NO.1 AND ALL PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO;
THESE CRIMINAL PETILTIONS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners in both the petitions is absent. The matters were passed over and called again in the post lunch session. None appears on behalf of the petitioners in both the petitions. Even on the last two dates of hearing, none appeared for the petitioners indicating that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petitions.
Hence, the petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.
In view of the dismissal of the petitions, I.A.No.2/2014 filed in both the petitions do not survive for consideration and they are also dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Bss