Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jamna Prasad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16666 of 2013 Applicant :- Jamna Prasad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Irfan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of applicant to press this application. Learned A.G.A. is present for State.
2. It appears that by efflux of time this application has rendered infructuous, probably due to completion of trial or for any other reason and that is why applicant is not interested to pursue this application.
3. Application is accordingly rejected.
Order Date :- 29.1.2019 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jamna Prasad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 January, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Mohd Irfan

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.