Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jamal Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11377 of 2019 Petitioner :- Jamal Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
The dispute in the writ petition is regarding the transfer of ownership of the motor vehicle car bearing registration no. U.P.-78-EP-6262.
Learned Standing Counsel, who was given time to seek instructions in the matter informs that according to the instructions, the vehicle has already been transferred in favour of transferee.
In view of above facts, which are not disputed, the writ petition has outlived its utility and no cause of action survives in it. Accordingly, the writ petition is directed to be consigned to the record.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 Sattyarth
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jamal Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Srivastava