Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Jalil Ahmad Ansari vs State Bank Of India Thru. Branch ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|10 November, 2014

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Re: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application.
Notice to the private respondent nos. 2 to 6 was sent by registered post.
We have perused the office report dated 7.11.2014 and in terms of Explanation-II Rule 12 of Chapter VIII of the Allahabad High Court Rules the service on the said respondents is deemed to be sufficient. Respondent no. 1 has already been served through Sri Satish Chaturvedi.
Despite time having been granted, no counter affidavit has been filed. We have perused the delay condonation application. Cause shown for the delay in filing the special appeal is sufficient. This application is allowed and delay in filing the special appeal is condoned. Office is directed to give regular number to this appeal.
Re: Special Appeal List this case on 19.11.2014.
Order Date :- 10.11.2014 SKS (Vivek Kumar Birla, J) (Vineet Saran, J)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jalil Ahmad Ansari vs State Bank Of India Thru. Branch ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
10 November, 2014
Judges
  • Vineet Saran
  • Vivek Kumar Birla