Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jaiveer Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44187 of 2018 Applicant :- Jaiveer Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Singh Gour,Virat Vaibhav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 834 of 2017, under Section 364A IPC, P.S. Sadar Bazar, District Agra.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further contended that the name of the present applicant has surfaced in the statement of co-accused Hanuman Das Gurjar. It is further submitted that the co-accused Fakira @ Atendra Singh, Ramkes, Banti, Hansraj Meena, Hanuman Das Gurjar having similar role have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 29.5.2018, 16.7.2018, 18.9.2018, 28.9.2018 and 1.10.2018 passed by the another Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 20458 of 2018, 26285 of 2018, 35043 of 2018, 37198 of 2018 and 37528 of 2018. Hence, the present applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. It is further contended that the criminal history of the applicant has been properly explained. Lastly he submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 14.12.2017 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned AGA has opposed the bail plea. However, learned A.G.A. does not dispute the factum of parity.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicant Jaiveer Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions;-
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.
iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.
iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission.
v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the complainant would be free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 Mini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jaiveer Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2019
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Vijay Singh Gour Virat Vaibhav