Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jai Pal vs State

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1621 of 1989 Revisionist :- Jai Pal Opposite Party :- State Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by judgment and order dated 25.07.1989 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar acquitting the opposite parties in Sessions Trial No. 122 of 1983 under Section 323/34 and 324/34 I.P.C.
3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jai Pal vs State

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Kumar Srivastava