Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jai Kran Lal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3163 of 2019 Petitioner :- Jai Kran Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P., Through Secretary Local Bodies, Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhan Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hemant Kumar Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri Dhan Pal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned standing counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Sri Hemant Kumar for respondent no.3.
The petitioner who was an employee of respondent no.3 attained the age of superannuation on 31.10.2018. He claims that his pensionary benefits has not been extended by respondents. He has relied upon an order of this Court dated 27.7.2018, passed in Writ-A no.16102 of 2018 in which a direction was issued to respondent no.2 to decide the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law in view of the law settled by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.7434 of 2016 (Habib Khan vs. State of Uttarakhand).
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the representation of petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 28.2.2019 AKJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jai Kran Lal vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2019
Judges
  • Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Advocates
  • Dhan Pal