Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jahir Singh vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22265 of 2019 Applicant :- Jahir Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Yatish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceeding of complaint case no. 684 of 2018 (Baldu Vs. Laxmi Prasad Kushwaha & Others), under sections 406, 420, 467, 468 IPC, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahoba, including summoning order dated 28.09.2018 passed in the aforesaid case.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground to quash the criminal proceedings including summoning order dated 28.09.2018, therefore, the prayer for quashing the same is hereby refused.
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application before the court concerned and prayed that some protection may be provided to the applicant.
Considering the request of the applicant and in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the applicant appears and moves an appropriate application for discharge under section 245(2) Cr.P.C. through counsel before the court below within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order then the application of the applicant shall be considered and decided expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of discharge application in accordance with law.
If the applicant moves an application as stated above within two weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant till disposal of the said application or four months from today, whichever is earlier.
Accordingly, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.6.2019/AKT
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jahir Singh vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 June, 2019
Judges
  • Neeraj Tiwari
Advocates
  • Yatish Kumar Dwivedi