Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Jagdish vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11002 of 2018 Applicant :- Jagdish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jaysingh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit which is taken on record.
This bail application has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No.1309 of 2017 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Talbehat, District Lalitpur, during the pendency of trial.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. Four criminal cases have been shown against the applicant in the gang chart i.e. Case Crime No.718 of 2017 under section 379/411 IPC, P.S. Talbehat; Case Crime No.958 of 2017 under section 379/411 IPC, P.S. Talbehat; Case Crime No.1123 of 2017 under section 307 IPC, PS Talbehat and Case Crime No.1126 of 2017 under section 3/25 Arms Act, P.S. Talbehat and in all of them he has been granted bail. The applicant is not involved in any other criminal case. The applicant is absolutely innocent and is languishing in jail since7.11.2017. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but has not controverted the aforesaid facts.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
In the light of the aforesaid arguments, looking to the fact of the case, taking into consideration the nature of offence, quantum of punishment and period of detention in jail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is found to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Jagdish involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 27.3.2018 AU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jagdish vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2018
Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh I
Advocates
  • Jaysingh Yadav