Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Jagdish vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6376 of 2019 Petitioner :- Jagdish Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Chandan Agarwal
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Anand Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Chandra Prakash Singh, learned Counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent and Sri Chandan Agarwal, learned Counsel for respondent 2.
2. Only provisional notice, asking petitioner to show cause as to why assessment be not made, is under challenge. Petitioner has remedy to reply the same, therefore, writ petition is not maintainable.
3. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Jagdish vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Chandra Prakash Singh