Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2009
  6. /
  7. January

J.283 vs The Collector

Madras High Court|16 April, 2009

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to enquire into the representation of the petitioner bank, dated 15.12.2003, on the basis of the records available, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits, within a specified period.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to enquire into the representation of the petitioner bank, dated 15.12.2003, on the basis of the records available, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the second respondent a copy of the representation, dated 15.12.2003, along with a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Index:Yes/No 16-04-2009 Internet:Yes/No csh To
1.The Collector, Tiruvellore District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruttani.
3.The Block Development Officer, Pallipet Taluk, Tiruvellore District.
M.JAICHANDREN,J.
csh Writ Petition No.920 of 2004 16-04-2009
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

J.283 vs The Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 April, 2009