IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA R.F.A. NO.864/2013 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1. MR. J. RAJAN S/O MR. V. JANARDHAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1042 11TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE BANGALORE – 560 040 2. MRS. BINDU RAJAN W/O J. RAJAN AGED 40 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1042 11TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 040 3. MASTER HEBIN RAJ S/O MR. J. RAJAN AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1042 11TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 040 4. MASTER HRITIK RAJAN S/O MR. J. RAJAN AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1042 11TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 040 SINCE DEFENDANT Nos.8 & 9/ APPELLANT NOs.3 & 4, THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER DEFENDANT No.7/ APPELLANT No.2.
...APPELLANTS (BY SRIYUTS K.V. SHYAMAPRASAD, ADV., FOR A1 ANIL KUMAR, ADV., FOR A2 TO A4) AND:
1. MR. R. TULASIDAS S/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.246 2ND MAIN, SUBHASHNAGAR MYSORE – 570 023 2. MR. R. GOPALAKRISHNA S/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS RESIDING AT KHB COLONY NAGAMANGALA – 571 401 MANDYA DISTRICT 3. MR. R. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O MR.Y.H. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.38/2 6TH CROSS, GUMMAIAH LAYOUT PADMANABHANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 070 4. MRS. JAYAMMA W/O LATE LAKKANNA D/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESIDING AT RAMASAGARA VILLAGE MAYASANDRA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK – 572 102 TUMKUR DISTRICT 5. MRS. VANAJAMMA W/O MR. VAJRAIAH @ CHIKKAIAH D/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1042 11TH MAIN VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE BANGALORE – 560 040 6. MR. C.UMESH BABU @ UMESH TEJASVI S/O MR. CHIKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1042 11TH MAIN VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE BANGALORE – 560 040 …RESPONDENTS THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.01.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.2302/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING AND PARTLY DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS R.FA. IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for both the parties submits that the dispute between the parties in respect of the suit schedule property has been settled on a compromise petition filed in R.F.A. No.1156/2009 before this Court on 10.11.2016.
In view of the same, the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as referred in R.F.A. No.1156/2009.
In view of the disposal of main appeal, I.A.1/2016 for impleading and taking steps to respondents does not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE BS