IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.3832-3833 OF 2015 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1. J A MANJUNATH S/O LATE ANANTHAPADMANABHA J Y AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 52, 3RD CROSS OMKAR NAGAR, ARAKERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-560076 2. SMT RAJANI B C W/O J A MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 52, 3RD CROSS OMKAR NAGAR ARAKERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-560076. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI SRIRANGA S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.VEERESHAPPA C A S/O CHANDRASHEKARAPPA C A AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A NO. MF-5/11, 2ND FLOOR BDA FLATS, MIC LAYOUT BTM LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE BANGALORE-560076 2.AUTHORISED OFFICER ALLAHABAD BANK BTM LAYOUT BRANCH NO. 947, 16TH MAIN, 2ND STAGE BTM LAYOUT BANGALORE-560076 3.THEERTHA ASSOCIATES NO. 17, 2ND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN MICO LAYOUT, BTM 2ND STAGE OPP BSNL CCC BANGALORE-560076 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER 4.N MANJUNATHA REDDY AND RATHNA NO. 28 AND 29, 18TH MAIN 7TH CROSS, BTM LAYOUT 2ND STAGE BANGALORE-560076. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI F. VARIS ALI, ADV. FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DTD:06.03.2015 R3 IS DELETED V/O DATED:06.03.2015 R4 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.01.2015 (ANNX-B) PASSED BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN SA NO.347/2013.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER These writ petitions are filed against the order dated 14.01.2015 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Bengaluru, produced as Annexure-B.
By the order dated 14.01.2015, the Debts Recovery Tribunal has continued the status-quo order granted on 12.01.2015 till 31.01.2015 and the main appeal in S.A. No.347/2013 has been dismissed on 23.12.2014 itself. After 31.01.2015, the status-quo has not been continued. Hence, the present writ petitions have become infructuous and are accordingly disposed of.
However, if any such order is passed in future, the petitioners herein are at liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate legal forum.
sac* Sd/- JUDGE