Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24441 of 2018 Petitioner :- Israr @ Raju And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Singh,Ranjeet Singh,Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mayank Srivastava
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Preetpal Singh, learned counsel for the caveator, Sri N.K. Verma, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 20.07.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 331 of 2018, under Sections 354, 452, 506, 376d IPC, Police Station-Nawabganj, District Allahabad.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations levelled against the petitioners are absolutely false, frivolous and baseless. From a perusal of the FIR, no offence is made out against the petitioners, hence, the same be quashed. He further submits that victim has filed a Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No.24381 of 2018 (Sakina Bano vs. State of U.P. and 4 others) in which this Court has directed to expedite the investigation and the same direction may also be given in this case.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 5.9.2018 AU