Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Islam vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37312 of 2021 Applicant :- Islam Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Sharma,Shamsuddin Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 332 of 2021 under Section 8/15 N.D.P.S. Act registered at P.S.- Ujhani, District- Badaun.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that he has been falsely implicated in this case. Whole prosecution story is false, concocted and untrustworthy. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that 6.2 kgs. doda powder is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant; the narcotic substance, alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant, is below the commercial quantity. There is no independent witness to support the prosecution story. Mandatory provisions of Sections 42, 43, 50, 52 and 57 of N.D.P.S. Act with regard to search and seizure have not been complied with. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in paragraph 14 of the Affidavit filed in support of Bail Application. Further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.07.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer for bail, however conceded that alleged recovered contraband substance is below commercial quantity.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Islam involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 21.12.2021 A. Mandhani
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Islam vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Ravindra Sharma Shamsuddin Ahmad