Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Iruthayasamy vs The District Collector

Madras High Court|08 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the second respondent to give sufficient opportunity to the petitioner with regard to alleged encroachment made in Re- Survey No.66/9, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.
2.Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents 1 to 3.
3.It is seen from the records that the third respondent has issued a notice to the petitioner, wherein it is stated that in Re-Survey No.66/9, certain encroachments are in existence. Under the said circumstances, the petitioner has been directed to remove the same.
4.The main grievance expressed on the side of the petitioner is that no opportunity has been given to the petitioner with regard to alleged encroachment made in Re-Survey No.66/9. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
5.In fine, the third respondent is directed to look into the representation dated 03.03.2017 alleged to have been given by the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period of one week. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai District,
3.The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai East Zone, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Iruthayasamy vs The District Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 March, 2017