Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Irshad Ahamad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23969 of 2018 Petitioner :- Irshad Ahamad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 02 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikrant Singh Parihar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sarfaraz Ahmad
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Vikrant Singh Parihar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sarfaraz Ahmad, learned counsel for the caveator, Sri N.K. Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 31.5.2018 registered as case crime no.0259 of 2018 under sections 354, 323, 504 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act, police station Kotwali Mau, District Mau.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have entered into a compromise. This fact has not been denied by the learned counsel for the caveator.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing.
Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and nature of the allegations, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in above mentioned case, till the submission of the police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. but he shall co-operate with the investigation of the case.
With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 30.8.2018 AU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Irshad Ahamad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 August, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Vikrant Singh Parihar