Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Intezar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52805 of 2019 Applicant :- Intezar Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Imran Mabood Khan,Kshatresh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard Sri Imran Mabood Khan and Sri Kshatresh Kumar, learned counsels for the applicant, Sri Krishna Shankar, learned counsel for the informant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Intezar, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 321 of 2019, under Sections 363, 366, 376, 328 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Chhapar, District- Muzaffar Nagar, during pendency of trial.
Submission is that the age of the victim, as per school record, is 17 years and 6 months and as per medical report, her age is 15-16 years. From the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she has not alleged any offence of rape against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the offence under Sections 363, 366 IPC does not appears to be made out against the applicant, since the victim herself admitted that she went with the applicant on her own. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is languishing in jail since 09.9.2019. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Intezar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Imran Mabood Khan Kshatresh Kumar