Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Inkhtab vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 60
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45706 of 2018 Applicant :- Inkhtab Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mumtaz Ali,Shad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.
Contention raised on behalf of the applicant has been confined to the extent that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from possession of the applicant. Factum of recovery is denied. There is no public independent witness to the fact of recovery in question. Offence alleged is triable by the Magistrate Ist Class. Co- accused Chintu has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 29.05.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.20105 of 2018. The applicant does not bear any criminal history and is languishing in jail since 19.03.2018.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed prayer for bail. However, learned A.G.A. has not disputed the aforesaid facts.
Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Inkhtab involved in Case Crime No.186 of 2018, under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Mawana, District Meerut be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurise/intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 29.11.2018 rkg
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Inkhtab vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2018
Judges
  • Arvind Kumar Mishra I
Advocates
  • Mumtaz Ali Shad Khan