Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Indus Towers Limited Represented By Its Authorized Signatory And Legal Head vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

Madras High Court|28 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The present criminal original petition has been filed directing the respondents to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner to carry on the mobile phone tower building and erection work at the premises being 2200 Sq Ft of vacant land bearing Plot No.47, Parthasarathi Street and comprised in S.F.No.106/3B, Jolarpettai Village, Tirupattur Taluk, Vellore District.
2. The case of the petitioner is that they are carrying on the business of establishing and maintaining telecommunication infrastructure/assets in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry and other parts of India. During the course of such business, they had entered into a lease agreement with one P. Devan in respect of the land situated at Plot No.47, Parthasarathi Street and comprised in S.F.No.106/3B, Jolarpettai Village, Tirupattur Taluk, Vellore District and had obtained his consent for the building, erection and maintenance of the mobile phone tower. They had also obtained necessary approval from the Government authorities in this regard. When the cluster Manager of the petitioner had gone to the said land for the purpose of mobile phone tower erection work, a group of people from that village had obstructed the same and had threatened to assault the workmen of the petitioner who involved in the erection of the tower. The petitioner gave a representation dated 01.06.2017 with the third respondent police. However, the said request was not considered by the respondents. Therefore, they have come up with the present petition for the above stated relief.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, having obtained all necessary permission, is trying to build and erect the mobile phone tower at the land in question, to cater the needs of mobile phone users residing in the locality, however, the same is objected by some people with an intention to extract money from them. Learned counsel further submitted that on earlier occasion, the petitioner has approached this Court for the very same purpose in respect of another land by filing Crl.OP.No.3437/2014, which was, by order dated 20.02.2014, disposed of, by granting police protection to the petitioner. Thus, he sought for similar direction in this petition also.
4. On the above submissions, I have heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and perused the entire materials available on record.
5. This Court, by order dated 20.02.2014, has disposed of the petition in Crl.OP No.3437/2014, with the following direction:
“Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to make specific application regards dates on which police protection is necessary towards carrying out their function and for this specific purpose, the respondent police is directed to afford police protection at the cost of the petitioner.”
Following the same, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present petition in the above terms.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, by directing the petitioner to make a fresh application with respect to the dates on which police protection is necessary for carrying out the work of mobile phone tower erection, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On making such application, the respondents are directed to afford police protection, so as to enable the petitioner to complete the said work. However, the same will be at the cost of the petitioner.
28-06-2017 Index:yes/no website:yes/no To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jolarpet, Vellore District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Jolarpet Police Station, Vellore District.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
R. MAHADEVAN.J., sr Crl.O.P.No.12176 of 2017 28-06-2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Indus Towers Limited Represented By Its Authorized Signatory And Legal Head vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 June, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan