Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Indus Mobile Distribution vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Madras High Court|25 July, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.K.Venkatsh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider their representation dated 11.1.2017, by which, they sought for refund of the (2) T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J RS excess tax paid after the respondent has adjusted a sum of Rs.4,40,36,376/- as mentioned in the certificate dated 19.8.2016.
3. Earlier, the petitioner sent their request on 02.7.2016 seeking refund. Since the application for refund is pending from July 2016, this Court is inclined to issue appropriate directions to the respondent to consider the same.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 02.7.2016 for refund, followed by the reminder dated 11.1.2017 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 25.7.2017 Internet : Yes To The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Alwarpet Assessment Circle, 46, Greenways Road, Chennai-28. WP.No.18865 of 2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Indus Mobile Distribution vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2017