1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Indrasen Tewari And Others vs State Of U P & Ors

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 October, 2018


Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39417 of 2003 Petitioner :- Indrasen Tewari And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioners.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:
“(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 5.4.2003, annexure no. 6 to the writ petition, passed by the District Inspector of Schools Deoria.
(b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents to pay the salary of the petitioners with arrear w.e.f. 1.7.91 will all consequential benefits, available to the post of L.T. Grade ad also pay the interest over the due salary in accordance with law.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioners are not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioners have lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.10.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Indrasen Tewari And Others vs State Of U P & Ors


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

11 October, 2018
  • Sudhir Agarwal
  • Ramesh Rai