Court No. - 18
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6363 of 2018 Petitioner :- Indradev Prasad Respondent :- Civil Judge ( Senior Division) Padrauna And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Awdhesh Narayan Srivastava
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause of the writ petition forthwith.
Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff-applicant.
In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed today, notices need not go to the defendant-respondent.
The applicant has approached this Court for issuing direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kushi Nagar (Padrauna) to decide the application 6-C moved by the petitioner in Suit No.71 of 2017 (Indradeo Prasad vs. Shambhu Pathak) within stipulated time.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Shiv Cotex Versus Tirgun Auto Plast P. Ltd and others, 2011 (89) ALR 232, has made the following observations:-
" It is high time that courts become sensitive to delays in justice delivery system and realize that adjournments do dent the efficacy of judicial process and if this menace is not controlled adequately, the litigant public may lose faith in the system sooner than later. The Courts, particularly Trial Courts, must ensure that on every date of hearing, effective progress takes place in the suit."
Considering the above, this petition stands disposed of with the direction upon the Court concerned to consider and decide the application 6-C moved by the petitioner in Suit No.71 of 2017 (Indradeo Prasad vs. Shambhu Pathak) in accordance with law, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost.
Order Date :- 31.8.2018 RKP