Heard Mr. Pandya, learned advocate for the applicants.
From the details mentioned in the application and submissions made by Mr. Pandya, learned advocate for the applicants, it, prima facie, appears that the grounds on which the FIR/complaint is challenged and request to quash the FIR/complaint is made are in nature of defence which ought to be raised and urged before the learned trial Court.
However, to ascertain further details and factual aspects and in light of the submissions by learned advocate for the applicants so far as certain applicants posted at different places, it is considered appropriate to issue notice, however, on condition that the applicants deposit a sum of Rs.7,500/- with the registry of this Court, which seems to be the amount of salary of respondent no.2.
Notice be made returnable on 1.2.2013. Mr. Kodekar, learned APP, waives service of notice for the respondent State.
It is clarified that any interim relief is not granted.
(K.M.THAKER, J.) kdc Page 2 of 2