Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Inam vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38654 of 2021 Applicant :- Inam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sukrampal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 85 of 2014 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 307 I.P.C. and Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act registered at P.S.- Devband, District- Saharanpur.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant has not committed the alleged offence. He was not arrested on the spot. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Further submitted that name of applicant came into light in the confessional statement of co-accused, Mursleen who has been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 32437 of 2021 on 10.12.2021 and case of the applicant is on better footing from the case of co-accused who has been granted bail. Further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 15.03.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the facts as raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, nature and severity of punishment in case of conviction, complicity of the accused and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that co-accused, Mursleen in whose statement, name of applicant came into light, has been granted bail, case of the applicant is on better footing from the case of co-accused, without commenting upon merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Inam involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 21.12.2021 A. Mandhani
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Inam vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Sukrampal