Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Imtiyaz Alam @ Inzmam Alam vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24811 of 2019 Applicant :- Imtiyaz Alam @ Inzmam Alam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abha Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.
Vakalatnama filed today by Mr. Shahrum Khan Advocate on behalf of complainant is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.123 of 2019, under Sections 307, 452 I.P.C. Police Station Chamanganj, District Kanpur Nagar.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to prosecution case on 18.02.2019 at 8:00 P.M. the applicant has forcefully entered into the house of informant and he attacked upon informant's sister with a hard and blunt object and he also attacked on informant. According to the medical report the injuries are simple in nature. He also submits that the applicant has also got injured in the incident There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. It is next contended that there is no criminal history of the applicant and he is languishing in jail since 18.02.2019.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail prayer and submitted that the applicant has forcefully entered into the house and attacked to Aurfiya (informant's sister) and when informant tried to safe her he was also received injuries in middle finger of his right hand. Learned A.G.A. submits that the applicant committed the alleged offence, therefore, the applicant is not entitled for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Imtiyaz Alam @ Inzmam Alam involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper or pressurize the prosecution evidence.
2. The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial Court.
3. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 20.6.2019 Sweety
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Imtiyaz Alam @ Inzmam Alam vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ali Zamin
Advocates
  • Abha Gupta